4G: 4th Cellular Generation in Brazil
| Coverage | 3G | 4G | 4.5G |
In this page: Monitors the evolution of cities and population covered by 4G technology (LTE) by each operator. |
Initinal coverage of 4G networks (Oct/22)
| Covered Cities | Population (%) |
|---|---|
| 5,497 | 99.7% |
Source: Operators
Cities covered with 4G technology in Brazil
Coverage without the incorporation of Oi
| Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Sep/22 | Oct/22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIM | 3,477 | 3,877 | 4,692 | 5,157 | 5,223 |
| Vivo | 3,206 | 3,598 | 4,286 | 4,615 | 4,619 |
| Claro | 2,788 | 2,864 | 2,962 | 3,219 | 3,281 |
| Oi | 1,018 | 1,035 | 1,043 | 1,043 | 1,043 |
| Algar | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Total | 4,779 | 5,169 | 5,421 | 5,478 | 5,497 |
Source: Operators
Covered with the incorporation of Oi
| Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Sep/22* | Oct/22* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIM | 3,477 | 3,877 | 4,692 | 5,157 | 5,157 |
| Claro | 2,788 | 2,864 | 2,962 | 3,249 | 3,310 |
| Oi | 1,018 | 1,035 | 1,043 | - | - |
| Algar | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
Source: Operators *Since Apr/22 cities covered by Oi were incorporated to Vivo, Claro and TIM.
Population covered with 4G technology in Brazil
Coverage without the incorporation of Oi
| Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Sep/22 | Oct/22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIM | 90.5% | 92.2% | 96.0% | 98.1% | 98.4% |
| Vivo | 88.7% | 90.8% | 93.4% | 95.3% | 95.4% |
| Claro | 86.0% | 86.6% | 87.3% | 89.0% | 89.4% |
| Oi | 69.5% | 69.8% | 70.0% | 70.0% | 70.0% |
| Algar | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Total | 96.9% | 98.3% | 99.4% | 99.7% | 99.7% |
Coverage with the incorporation of Oi
| Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Sep/22 | Oct/22 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIM | 90,5% | 92,2% | 96,0% | 98.1% | 98.1% |
| Claro | 86,0% | 86,6% | 87,3% | 89.1% | 89.5% |
| Oi | 69,5% | 69,8% | 70,0% | - | - |
| Algar | 1,3% | 1,3% | 1,3% | 1.3% | 1.3% |
Source: Operators *Since Apr/22 cities covered by Oi were incorporated to Vivo, Claro and TIM.
Brazilian Cities Covered by 4G technology - Oct/22
| Operators | Cities | % Cities | Population | % Population |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Covered | 73 | 1.3% | 570,950 | 0.3% |
| 1 | 468 | 8.4% | 4,592,721 | 2.2% |
| 2 | 2,220 | 39.9% | 22,548,145 | 10.6% |
| 3 | 1,966 | 35.3% | 38,419,551 | 18.0% |
| 4 | 828 | 14.9% | 144,750,067 | 67.9% |
| 5 | 15 | 0.3% | 2,436,205 | 1.1% |
| Total Covered | 5,497 | 98.7% | 212,746,689 | 99.7% |
Cities coverde by 4G technology in Oct/22
| State | Vivo | Claro | TIM | Oi | Algar | Sercomtel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acre | 17 | 19 | 15 | 4 | - | - |
| Alagoas | 80 | 45 | 102 | 14 | - | - |
| Amazonas | 30 | 51 | 55 | 22 | - | - |
| Amapá | 8 | 9 | 9 | 6 | - | - |
| Bahia | 326 | 211 | 417 | 121 | - | - |
| Ceará | 141 | 99 | 184 | 62 | - | - |
| Brasília | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
| Espírito Santo | 78 | 54 | 78 | 19 | - | - |
| Goiás | 157 | 160 | 189 | 48 | 2 | - |
| Maranhão | 107 | 165 | 197 | 48 | - | - |
| Minas Gerais | 822 | 376 | 853 | 106 | 16 | - |
| Mato Grosso do Sul | 67 | 52 | 64 | 13 | 1 | - |
| Mato Grosso | 94 | 73 | 93 | 25 | - | - |
| Pará | 115 | 107 | 144 | 54 | - | - |
| Paraíba | 177 | 46 | 223 | 13 | - | - |
| Pernambuco | 154 | 116 | 185 | 61 | - | - |
| Piauí | 151 | 89 | 198 | 33 | - | - |
| Paraná | 374 | 249 | 399 | 58 | - | - |
| Rio de Janeiro | 92 | 70 | 92 | 38 | - | - |
| Rio Grande do Norte | 129 | 46 | 167 | 15 | - | - |
| Rondônia | 30 | 46 | 22 | 9 | - | - |
| Roraima | 6 | 11 | 10 | 3 | - | - |
| Rio Grande do Sul | 428 | 300 | 434 | 80 | - | - |
| Santa Catarina | 286 | 196 | 295 | 54 | - | - |
| Sergipe | 72 | 24 | 66 | 11 | - | - |
| São Paulo | 645 | 561 | 645 | 106 | 8 | - |
| Tocantins | 32 | 105 | 86 | 19 | - | - |
| Brazil | 4,619 | 3,281 | 5,223 | 1,043 | 27 | - |
4G coverage by SMC Region in Oct/22

| Region | Cities | % Cities | Population | % Population | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 and 2 | São Paulo Capital and SP Interior | 645 | 100.0% | 46,649,132 | 100.0% |
| 3 | Rio de Janeiro/Espírito Santo | 170 | 100.0% | 21,571,857 | 100.0% |
| 4 | Minas Gerais | 853 | 100.0% | 21,411,923 | 100.0% |
| 5 | Paraná/Santa Catarina | 697 | 100.0% | 18,959,181 | 100.0% |
| 6 | Rio Grande do Sul | 490 | 99.2% | 11,432,808 | 99.9% |
| 7 | Middle West | 620 | 91.2% | 20,593,532 | 97.9% |
| 8 | North | 450 | 99.1% | 21,684,453 | 99.8% |
| 9 | Bahia/Sergipe | 492 | 100.0% | 17,323,758 | 100.0% |
| 10 | Northeast | 1,080 | 99.5% | 33,120,045 | 99.8% |
| Total | 5,497 | 98.7% | 212,746,689 | 99.7% | |
4G coverage by city in Oct/22
| SMC | Vivo | Claro | TIM | Oi | Algar | Sercomtel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 and 2 | 645 | 561 | 645 | 106 | 8 | - |
| 3 | 170 | 124 | 170 | 57 | - | - |
| 4 | 822 | 376 | 853 | 106 | 16 | - |
| 5 | 662 | 447 | 697 | 112 | - | - |
| 6 | 426 | 298 | 431 | 80 | - | - |
| 7 | 398 | 456 | 470 | 119 | 3 | - |
| 8 | 266 | 343 | 415 | 133 | - | - |
| 9 | 398 | 235 | 483 | 132 | - | - |
| 10 | 832 | 441 | 1,059 | 198 | - | - |
| Total | 4,619 | 3,281 | 5,223 | 1,043 | 27 | - |
Percentage of 4G coverage by population in Oct/22
| SMC | Vivo | Claro | TIM | Oi | Algar | Sercomtel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 and 2 | 100.0% | 99.2% | 100.0% | 78.1% | 1.2% | - |
| 3 | 100.0% | 96.2% | 100.0% | 88.0% | - | - |
| 4 | 99.2% | 80.6% | 100.0% | 62.6% | 9.3% | - |
| 5 | 98.3% | 92.1% | 100.0% | 64.4% | - | - |
| 6 | 98.5% | 92.4% | 97.2% | 63.1% | - | - |
| 7 | 91.3% | 91.4% | 90.4% | 66.7% | 0.7% | - |
| 8 | 84.1% | 91.1% | 97.1% | 68.8% | - | - |
| 9 | 94.1% | 76.6% | 99.5% | 61.9% | - | - |
| 10 | 91.3% | 78.4% | 98.9% | 64.6% | - | - |
| Total | 95.4% | 89.4% | 98.4% | 70.0% | 1.3% | - |
Commitments for 4G Coverage in 2.5 GHz
The commitments in 2.5 GHz will allow to cover:
| Deadline | Coverage | Cities | % Pop |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 2013 | ALL the cities hosting de Confederation Cup 2013 | Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Salvador (BA), Brasília (DF), Fortaleza (CE), Belo Horizonte (MG) and Recife (PE). |
9.4% |
| December 2013 | ALL the cities hoting and co-hosting the World Cup 2014 (chosen ones) |
Belo Horizonte (MG), Brasília (DF), Cuiaba (MT), Curitiba (PR), Fortaleza (CE), Manaus (AM),Natal (RN),Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Recife (PE), Salvador (BA), São Paulo (SP) and Porto Alegre (RS). |
25.2% |
| May 2014 | ALL the capital cities having more than 500 thousand inhab. | 45 | 30.6% |
| December 2015 | ALL the cities having more than 200 thousand inhab. | + 91 | +14.0% |
| December 2016 | ALL the cities having more than 100 thousand inhab. | + 152 | +10.5% |
| December 2017 | *ALL the cities having between 30 and 100 thousand inhab. | + 791** | +20.7% |
* As the cities co-hosting the World Cup (training centers) would be chosen only in January 2014, Anatel and operators, represented by SindiTelebrasil, agreed to replace the demand on "Edital" to cover more 12 cities indicated as co-hosts of the World Cup by the coverage of more 27 cities, besides hosting cities, until december 31st 2013 by one or more operators. The training centers will have punctual coverage until April 2014.
Coverage for the World Cup 2014
The coverage commitments by the auction of 4G frequencies (2.5 GHz) establiched the end of 2013 as deadline to operators to cover with 4G all the cities hosting and co-hosting the World Cup 2014.
The four operators covered with 4G the host cities accoring to the deadline, however, the cities co-hosting the event (Training Centers) would be chosen only in January 2014. Anatel and operators, represented by SindiTelebrasil, agreed to replace the demand on "Edital" to cover more 12 cities indicated as co-hosts of the World Cup by: