Fixed Broadband in Brazil | ||
Brazil | Market Share | Fiber |
In this page: Keeps track of FTTH evolution in Brazil. |
Fiber Accesses by Operator
Operators | 1Q23 | 2Q23 | 3Q23 | 4Q23 | 1Q24 | 2Q24 | Jul/24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 20,081 | 20,790 | 21,442 | 21,836 | 22,538 | 22,855 | 22,642 |
Vivo | 5,652 | 5,809 | 5,992 | 6,175 | 6,348 | 6,547 | 6,614 |
Oi | 4,225 | 4,283 | 4,256 | 4,248 | 4,262 | 4,266 | 4,262 |
Claro | 968 | 1,058 | 1,171 | 1,299 | 1,426 | 1,550 | 1,600 |
TIM | 592 | 643 | 692 | 719 | 733 | 737 | 740 |
Total | 31,521 | 32,589 | 33,571 | 34,310 | 35,365 | 36,040 | 35,945 |
% Total in Brazil | 67.8% | 69.2% | 70.1% | 70.6% | 71.6% | 72.0% | 72.3% |
Operators | 1Q22 | 2Q22 | 3Q22 | 4Q22 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 16,300 | 16,973 | 18,195 | 18,982 |
Vivo | 4,838 | 5,049 | 5,278 | 5,483 |
Oi | 3,765 | 3,905 | 4,052 | 4,136 |
Claro | 671 | 732 | 797 | 885 |
TIM | 443 | 479 | 514 | 549 |
Total | 26,017 | 27,138 | 28,836 | 30,036 |
% Total in Brazil | 60.8% | 62.8% | 65.3% | 66.2% |
Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 6,154 | 10,316 | 15,326 | 18,982 | 21,836 |
Vivo | 2,477 | 3,376 | 4,608 | 5,483 | 6,175 |
Oi | 1,019 | 2,426 | 3,609 | 4,136 | 4,248 |
Claro | 268 | 459 | 623 | 885 | 1,299 |
TIM | 181 | 315 | 417 | 549 | 719 |
Total | 10,099 | 16,892 | 24,583 | 30,036 | 34,310 |
% Brazilian Total | 30.7% | 46.5% | 59.0% | 66.2% | 70.6% |
Fiber Market Share by Operator
Operator | 1Q23 | 2Q23 | 3Q23 | 4Q23 | 1Q24 | 2Q24 | Jul/24 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 63.7% | 63.8% | 63.9% | 63.6% | 63.7% | 63.4% | 63.0% |
Vivo | 17.9% | 17.8% | 17.8% | 18.0% | 17.9% | 18.2% | 18.4% |
Oi | 13.4% | 13.1% | 12.7% | 12.4% | 12.1% | 11.8% | 11.9% |
Claro | 3.1% | 3.2% | 3.5% | 3.8% | 4.0% | 4.3% | 4.5% |
TIM | 1.9% | 2.0% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.1% | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Total | 31,521 | 32,589 | 33,571 | 34,310 | 35,365 | 36,040 | 35,945 |
Operators | 1Q22 | 2Q22 | 3Q22 | 4Q22 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 62.7% | 62.5% | 63.1% | 63.2% |
Vivo | 18.6% | 18.6% | 18.3% | 18.3% |
Oi | 14.5% | 14.4% | 14.1% | 13.8% |
Claro | 2.6% | 2.7% | 2.8% | 2.9% |
TIM | 1.7% | 1.8% | 1.8% | 1.8% |
Total | 26,017 | 27,138 | 28,836 | 30,036 |
Operator | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Competitive Operators | 60.9% | 61.1% | 62.3% | 63.2% | 63.6% |
Vivo | 24.5% | 20.0% | 18.7% | 18.3% | 18.0% |
Oi | 10.1% | 14.4% | 14.7% | 13.8% | 12.4% |
Claro | 2.7% | 2.7% | 2.5% | 2.9% | 3.8% |
TIM | 1.8% | 1.9% | 1.7% | 1.8% | 2.1% |
Total Geral | 10,099 | 16,892 | 24,583 | 30,036 | 34,310 |
Cities Covered with Fiber Backhaul
- | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Covered Cities | 2,687 | 3,164 | 3,458 | 3,600 | 4,012 | 4,403 | 4,610 |
Fiber Backhaul by Operator - 2021
Operator | Covered Cities |
---|---|
Oi | 2,392 |
Vivo | 1,603 |
Claro | 1,561 |
Competitives | 4,190 |
Fiber in Brazil
The image below presents the option made made Brazilian operators from the many architectures avaible for FTTX.
Note: GVT offers FFTH for speeds higher than 100 MBps.
GVT announced during Futurecom 2013 that after analyzing several options, including vectoring, it decided to adopt the FTTH architecture with Gpon for its access network architecture.